Sultan al-Nasir (Nasser) Mohamed (Muhammad) Ben Qalawoon (Qalaun) was a
Bahari Mamluke who ruled Egypt no less than three times, first
between 1293 and 1294 AD, the second between 1298 and 1309,
and finally once again between 1309 and 1340. He was the only
son of Qalawun (Qalaun) by a Mongol princess named Aslun
Khatun, who is perhaps best known as a prolific builder in Cairo. Basically, he ruled Egypt for forty-two
years, beginning at age eight, except
for two intervals totaling about five years, when he was still
too young to hang on to the empire he had inherited and his
rivals were able to depose him until he was strong enough to
hold onto Egypt.
The sultan who ruled during the second interruption of al-Nasir
Mohamed's long reign was Hossam Eddin Lagin, who had taken
part in the murder of Sultan al-Khalil some years before.
Afterward the murder, he hid in the neglected mosque of Ibn
Tulun. He swore that if he ever got power and wealth, he would
restore Ibn Tulun's mosque from its existing state of ruin at
that time. So when he became sultan in 1296, he fulfilled his
promise. However, al-Nasir once again took power in 1298, and
in 1299 Lagim was murdered while saying his prayers.
When al-Nasir was finally able to completely establish
himself as Egypt's ruler, he became another of those
incredible rulers who made Cairo
a brutal fairy tale of such
wealth and cruelty and art and beauty that it is always
difficult for a modern European or American to understand the
complexity of the times. He was lame and had a cataract film
over his eye like Baybars, was fanatically strict about morals
and ruled so absolutely with such brutality, viciousness and
deceit that he kept all his rival Mamlukes completely under
his thumb.
One ancient traveler from Tangier, Ibn Batuta, who passed
through Cairo on his way to Mecca in 1326, was very impressed
with al-Nasir Mohamed's nobility and morality, but he also
recorded several different stories showing how the Sultan
murdered his opponents, sometimes using the Ismaili sect as
private assassins, and sometimes pursuing his rivals as far as
Iraq, where the Ismailis killed them with poisoned
knives.
However, this was a period of prosperity in Egypt,
specifically in Cairo, where Egypt had settled into a
thoroughly feudal trading system given it by Saladin
(Salah al-Din). The Mamlukes, who's governing of Egypt is so alien to
us today, had nevertheless helped unify the state and the
outlets for trade were also fairly safe, particularly in the
Mediterranean, despite the continuing wars with Mongols and
crusaders. Al-Naser was clever enough to make good alliances
on his borders, the most important of which was probably the
Golden Horde on the Volga, who were bitter rivals of the
eastern Mongols. He also seems to have kept his peace with
Constantinople.
Al-Nasir is noted by historians for his defeat of the
Mongols, expansive building projects in Cairo, the wealth of
his reign, and some curious problems with the Coptic
Christians of Egypt. Until now, the Coptics had suffered very
little in Muslim-ruled Cairo, and were, for example, as
bitterly opposed to the crusaders as the Muslims themselves.
In fact, with a few exceptions, the Copts of Cairo had
prospered almost too much under the Fatimids, as well as the
Mamlukes, at least until now.
Al-Nasir took on the Mongols at Marj al-Suffrar, near
Damascus, on April 20th 1303, and there he defeated them. In
1303, when he returned, Cairo
was ecstatic to meet him.
Pavilions and grandstands lined the route of his entry, and
the whole city was hung with silken banners. Rooms were rented
on his return route for exorbitant prices, and the streets
were laid with silk carpets over which al-Nasir and his
soldiers rode. They were followed by seven hundred
Tartar-Mongol prisoners in chains, and around each Mongol's
neck was tied the severed head of another Mongol. A thousand
more Tartar heads adorned the lances of the Mamluke warriors
who followed him. Afterwards, the city went crazy and
"disorders" were committed with women, soldiers got
drunk, and an earthquake ended it all, which most of the
citizens thought was a punishment from God Himself for too
much pleasure.
Afterwards, the climate of international peace brought to
Egypt domestic tranquility to a large degree, and with it
economic prosperity, allowing al-Nasir free reign to pursue
his evident love of building. Makrizi (Maqrisi) estimates that
he spent an average of 100,000 dirhams a day on his
construction projects, and encouraged his principal emirs to
follow suit. Much of al-Nasir's Cairo
is still standing,
including about eighteen mosques, tombs and colleges, though
not all of them were built by him. During his reign, all of
his emirs competed with each other and were by al-Nasir
through land grants to build beautiful mosques, tombs and
colleges, and thirty-three were built between 1320 and 1340.
However, in his book, Cairo, Adre Raymond claims to have
tracked down no less than fifty-four mosques and
madrasas
built between 1293 and 1340
Al-Nasir's most famous works, built by him, were the
aqueduct which once took water from the Nile to the
Citadel,
his college and mausoleum next to
Qalaun's
hospital, and the
mosque he built in the Citadel, which was later used as a
prison.
The origin of the aqueduct has been a matter of dispute
among some scholars, but Makrizi says that it was al-Nasir who
built it between 1340 and 1341. yet there were always signs of
an earlier aqueduct underneath it which could have been
attributable to Saladin. However, in 1919, the Egyptian
archaeologist Ali Bahgat excavated part of the aqueduct and
discovered that what lay beneath was not an aqueduct at all,
but part of an old city wall. This aqueduct of al-Nasir was
used right up until 1872. He apparently built, or rebuilt
several canals that supplied water to the city as well.
However, in the final analysis it is the sheer totality of
the building that took place during his reign that is so
impressive. Stanley Lane-Poole describes the expansion of the
city under Nasir "in every direction," while Marcel
Clerget says that it was "full to bursting," where
"the empty lots...are rented out and immediately overrun
with buildings; gardens that surround houses during the
Fatimid period are being filled with several-story apartment
houses. The public squares are disappearing." Sometimes
historians are critical of the long-term effects of Nasir's
construction policies, and at other times not, but build he
did.
This old Cairo of al-Nasir was a complex city that Ibn
Batuta (Battuta) descries as the mother of all cities, and
goes on to call it, "peerless in beauty and splendor, the
meeting place of comer and goer, the stopping place of feeble
and strong." He also says that it was full of:
"the learned and the ignorant, the grave and the
gay, the mild and the choleric, the noble and the base, the
obscure and the illustrious. Like the waves of the sea she
surges with her throngs of folks, yet for all the capacity
of her station and her power to sustain can scarce hold
their number"
Various estimates put the population of Cairo
of this time
at between 500,000 and 600,000, so al-Nasir seems to have been
required to build up the city, and change its appearance
forever.
Ibn Batuta also tells us that there were twelve thousand
water carriers who transported water on camel to the city, thirty
thousand hirers of mules and donkeys and thirty thousand boats
on the Nile
which sailed up and down, laden with goods of all
kinds. He says that the people were in love with pleasure and
amusement, and he notes one event in which Cairo
was decorated
with silks and rich ornaments for days, all to celebrate al-Nasir's
recovery from a fractured wrist.
The Nile
trade that Ibn Batuta mentions was a very
important factor in Cairo's prosperity during this period. At
this time, Venice had just begun to establish itself on the
Italian mainland, some of Cairo's goods began to fill its
markets. Many of the thirty thousand ships Ibn Batuta refers
to went down the Nile to Alexandria where they were transshipped
on to Italy, as well as to Constantinople. The importance that
al-Nasir attached to this Mediterranean trade is shown by the
canal he dug between Alexandria and the Nile in 1311, which is
said to have required the work of a hundred thousand men.
Furthermore, there are reported to have been some 200 Karimi
merchants who had commercial interest in Yemen, Jidda, Aydhab,
Qus, Cairo, Alexsandria and Damietta, and sometimes ranging as
far a field as the Sudan and the Indian Ocean region.
While Egypt was not quite al-Nasir's private estate, it was
to some degree his private trading organization, and his
wealth lived up to all past reputations of waste and excess.
He spent a fortune on his stud horses, and when his son was
married, some twenty thousand beasts were slaughtered for the occasion.
When he went on a pilgrimage to Mecca, he ate fresh vegetables
even in the desert, brought along on his traveling garden
carried by forty camels.
And then there was the Christian problem. Suddenly, during
al-Nasir's time, there were demonstrations against the
Christians in Cairo. Cairo was at this time full of Muslim
refugees from the Mongols, and doubtless they played a part in
this. They were most likely a large and dissatisfied element,
if what we know of modern displaced people is any indication.
First, a church outside Bab el-Luk, which al-Nasir had ordered
to be left alone, was razed to the ground by an angry crowd,
and this ripened into other incidents when finally there were
thousands of people in the streets of Cairo demonstrating
against the Christians.
It is very possible that these events might have been a way
for the people to protest al-Nasir himself, who had used Copts
as advisers. His taxes and laws had become very oppressive,
and the fact that he had used the Christians in his government
made them ideal scapegoats. Soon some of the people began to
light fires around Cairo, and the city began to burn. No
sooner was one fire put out than another was started, the
work, it seems, of some obviously skilled group of arsonists.
Then, a Christian was caught in Baybars' Mosque with a pot of
oil ready to set it alight, and soon the city went completely berserk.
Since most of the other fires had started near mosques the
origin of the fires seemed obvious. The Christian caught in
Baybars' Mosque and some monks were tortured and they admitted
setting fires in the city. Even though the Coptic patriarch
denounced the arsonists, a Melchite convent in the Mukattam
was razed to the ground, and four monks were burned alive. By
now, the streets were filled with an angry mob of people
caught up in a sudden hatred of Christians. The city bazaars
were closed up tight, and the whole demonstration got so out
of hand and frightening that al-Nasir arrested two hundred
people, all of whom were Muslims.
Though no direct evidence exists, this would indicate that
the Muslims themselves were against al-Nasir. He seems to have
been more determined to suppress the Muslim demonstrator than
the Christians, because he had the two hundred hanged by their
hands on gallows set up along the city streets and alleyways
near Bab
Zuweila. They were left their until they died, but he
executed no Christians. He did, however, humiliate the
Christians them by making them ride backward on their donkeys,
and forced them once more to wear blue turbans and bell around
their necks when they were in the public baths. It seem clear
that these measures were intended to divert away from himself,
and on to the Christians, whatever trouble had stirred people
up in the first place.
While this seems almost an isolated problem, in fact the
disturbances between Christians and Muslims during al-Nasir's
reign resulted in a large-scale conversion to Islam which
culminated, soon after his death, with the Christians finally
becoming a religious minority in Egypt.
There was really very little respect in Cairo
for al-Naisr.
While the Mamluks were indeed violent rulers of Egypt, the
population was certainly itself not docile. In fact, it
sometimes seems that the more brutal the Mamluek sultan, the
more rebellious, or at least disrespectful, the population.
Cairo apparently always managed to somehow enjoy itself, and
thrive in its own way while protesting with raw, rude wit when
a sultan did anything that was unpopular. For example, al-Nasir
felt this very forcefully when he arrested a Mamluke emir
named Tushtu, whose popular name in Cairo was "Green
Chickpeas". Tushtu had the habit of giving large sums of
money to the harafish, who were the vagabonds of Cairo.
According to Ibn Batuta, the harafish were a "large,
organized body, hard-faced folk and lewd". At one point,
al-Nasir imprisoned Tushtu, but then thousands of the harafish
showed up outside the Citadel
to demonstrate his arrest,
changing, among other rude things, "Listen, thou
all-starred cripple. Let him go! al-Nasir wisely followed
their insulting advice and quickly turned Green Chickpeas
loose.
Much of al-Nasir's wealth was at the expense taxation
imposed by him on everything salable, including salt and
slaves. The city seemed to thrive fabulously during his reign,
but it suffered terribly after his death in 1341. The whole
country was ripped apart by civil war, famine and finally the
plague, known in Europe as the Black Death, but which is said
to have eventually killed as many as nine hundred thousand
people in Cairo alone.
References:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Cairo |
Raymond, Andre |
2000 |
Harvard University Press |
ISBN 0-674-00316-0 |
|
Cairo: An Illustrated History |
Raymond, Andre, Editor |
2002 |
Rizzoli, New York |
ISBN 0-8478-2500-0 |
|
Cairo (Biography of a City) |
Aldridge, James |
1969 |
Little, Brown and Company |
ISBN 72-79364 |
|
Cairo: The City Victorious |
Rodenbeck, Max |
1998 |
Vintage Books (A Division of Random House, Inc. |
ISBN 0-679-76727-4 |
Archives
|