|
When the Antiquities Society was formed in Cairo by Auguste
Mariette in 1858, for the first time, controls were placed on
excavations and exports of discovered artifacts. Anyone
planning to dig had to first obtain a signed agreement from
the Society, and inspectors thereafter had to be allowed on
site any time. No tomb could b entered without an inspector
present, and the contents of any violated tomb had to be first
presented to the new Egyptian Museum. After the Museum made
its selections from amongst the artifacts, the rest would
belong to the excavator. Contents of unviolated, or intact,
tombs would remain the property of the Egyptian government.
But illicit excavations continued. Amelia Edwards, one of
the travelers to Egypt in the late 19th century,
who recorded her observations and perceptions, herself
witnessed such a dig, and was able to see a coffin brought to
light, carved with hieroglyphics and the Four Sons of Horus
(so she wrote.) She further recorded that "Objects of
great rarity and antiquity were being brought to Europe every
season by travelers who had purchased them from native dealers
living on the spot; and many of these objects were
historically traceable to certain Royal dynasties which made
Thebes their royal city…At length, suspicion became
certainty."
What was this suspicion all about?
In 1874, Gaston Maspero, the head of the Antiquities
Service in Cairo, noticed that on the antiquities market,
figures bearing royal names from the 21st
Dynasty,
a wooden tablet inscribed in scribal ink, a papyrus belonging
to Queen Nedjmet, and other artifacts were being sold. Other
important objects like papyri, shabti-figurines, bronze
vessels, inscribed wrapping, and perhaps even at least one
mummy (that of the missing Ramesses I?), were also leaking out
onto the Luxor antiquities market. Maspero knew these came
from no licensed excavation, yet, they had to have come from
somewhere.
Maspero sent investigators but they learned nothing for
years, while antiquities continued to appear. Finally in 1881
Maspero enlisted the aid of Charles Wilbour, a wealthy
American collector, who was known to be willing to pay high
prices for authentic antiquities. Within a few days of his
arrival in Luxor, Wilbour made contact with a local guide who
brought him to the village of Qurnah and the house of Ahmed
Abd el Rassul. Wilbour was shown a quantity of red leather,
looking as fresh as if it had just been opened, and stamped
with the titles of an 18th Dynasty king. Wilbour
immediately telegraphed Maspero.
Since the apparent culprits for the illegal sales were
three brothers of the family of Abd el Rasul, Maspero issued
warrants for the arrests of Ahmed and Hussein el-Rassul.
Mustapha Agha Ayat, the consular agent for Britain, Belgium,
and Russia, stationed in Luxor, was also implicated. The
governor of Qurnah gave Maspero permission to interrogate
Ahmed el Rasul. But Ahmed refused to confess, and the mayor
and leading townspeople of Qurna testified to his honesty on
his behalf. Hussein was never heard of again however. Shortly
thereafter, the authorities heard that quarrels had sprung up
between the brothers: Ahmed insisted upon taking a half-share
in profits from the treasure trove, as compensation for his
jail time.
Mohammed el-Rassul, the eldest brother, then turned
informer, and went to the authorities to divulge the location
of the hidden tomb. The story Mohammed told of the discovery
of the tomb was this: One day, years before, a goat belonging
to Ahmed had strayed from its herd on the cliffs in the bay of
Deir el-Bahri. When Ahmed investigated and followed the
bleating of his animal, he found that it had fallen down one
of the vertical tomb-shafts, which honeycombed the cliffs. As
he cursed the goat, he descended after it and found himself in
a cramped corridor, cluttered with dark shapes. After he lit a
candle, he saw that the shapes were a collection of dusty
wooden coffins, stretching as far as he could see, heaped one
upon another. Ahmed could see the occasional uraeus,
the royal cobra, and several cartouches inscribed on the
coffin lids. He also found shabtis, shabti-boxes, canopic
jars, and other funerary paraphernalia. Ahmed’s eyes must
have widened, as he realized that this was a royal find.
The el-Rassul family lived comfortably off the proceeds of
their tomb, until, in the mid-1870s, the growing number of
important funerary papyri reaching the west, as well as other
objects in circulation on the local antiquities market gave
the game away.
Mohammed then took the officials of the Antiquities Society
to Deir el Bahri. He showed them the actual tomb chamber,
which contained coffins of some of ancient Egypt’s greatest
Kings of the New Kingdom. The funerary trappings had
disappeared, the gold sarcophagi had been melted down, and the
mummies had even been re-wrapped. But there they lay, beside
the mummies of non-royal mummies.
Since Gaston Maspero was in France by this time, Emile
Brugsch, an assistant at the museum in Bulaq, was called in to
investigate the find. As he lowered himself into the shaft,
Brugsch saw a low corridor piled high with "cases of
porcelain funerary offerings, metal and alabaster vessels,
draperies, trinkets, and then around a passage, a cluster of
mummy cases…in such numbers…"
The mummies of kings that were found in this cache were
Seqenenre-Taa, who had fought the Hyksos and bore a great head
wound as apparent evidence, Ahmose I, the founder of the New
Kingdom, Amenhotep I, the first three Tutmosids, Seti I,
Ramesses II, III and IX, and the coffin of Ramesses I. Within
a matter of days, the tomb was emptied, and its occupants, in
excess of 50 kings, princes, and courtiers, with almost 6,000
accompanying objects, were sent to Bulaq.
Prior to this find, it was already clear that each king was
buried separately and independently of his predecessor(s). And
each burial certainly had beautiful coffins, and funerary
objects lain to rest with them. So why this jumbled
collection? And why were some of the coffins in such poor
condition, not truly suited to their royal tenants.
One indication of the reason for this reburial was the
following text written in ink on the bandages of the mummy of
Ramesses II:
"Year 15, 3rd month of Akhet, Day 6: Day of
bringing the Osiris king Usermaatre-setepenre (Ramesses II),
Life! Prosperity! And Health!, to renew him and to bury him in
the tomb of the Osiris king Menmaatre-Seti (I) Life!
Prosperity! Health! By the high priest of Pinudjem."
So apparently the mummy of Ramesses II had been removed
from his tomb, and re-buried in the tomb of Seti I, and then
both those mummies and that of Ramesses I, had been removed
and reburied within the tomb of Queen Inhapy. With these
movements, the kings had lost most of their original burial
equipment along the way. Gaston Maspero speculated that these
constant moves were prompted by the attentions of tomb-robbers
at the end of the New Kingdom. However, experts today believe
that the stripping of the dead had not been done by local
robbers, but by the state itself, hungry for gold at a time of
economic decline. Evidence for this theory comes from the
discovery of the funerary equipment and jewels for these
earlier kings turning up, reused, in the burials at Tanis of
their 21st and 22nd Dynasty successors.
Maspero decided that the mummies fell into two groups, one,
dating from the Second Intermediate and New Kingdom periods,
poorly coffined, and the second, better equipped and dating
from the later Third Intermediate Period.
The final royal resting-place at Deir el-Bahri where these
50+ coffins were found was the family vault of the Theban high
priest Pinudjem II, whose relations had occupied the end
chamber of the tomb. Several decades later, after Year 11 of
Shoshenq I in the 22nd
Dynasty, the priestly family
was joined by these battered royal mummies.
Mohammed el-Rassul meanwhile took on a job as foreman for
the Antiquities Society. In 1891 he led an inspector to yet
another site in Deir el Bahri, where bodies of almost 160
successive high priests from Karnak, lay at rest. Since it was
suspected that Mohammed had known for quite a while about this
cache, he was dismissed from the Society.
But the cache of royal mummies found at Deir el-Bahri was
not the only one of its kind. In 1898 Victor
Loret, excavating
in the Valley of the Kings, not only discovered the tomb of
Amenhotep II, but another royal cache in the tomb itself.
Thirteen mummies, including those of Amenhotep II, Seti II,
and Siptah, lay in this second cache.
In the same room with the magnificent royal sarcophagus,
Loret found other corpses, scattered everywhere. The first,
thought to be King Sethnakht of the 20th
Dynasty,
had been laid out on the battered hull of one of Amenhotep II’s
wooden model boats, left in the antechamber to the tomb. Three
further mummies were found, without coffins, and stripped of
their bandages. They were neatly placed in a side-room leading
off the burial chamber. The first had long flowing hair and a
thick veil on her forehead and left eye. This was the mummy
later called "The Elder Lady." The second mummy was
that of a young boy, his head shaved except on the right
temple, where the sidelock of youth flowed. The third mummy
was that of a youthful woman, whose face showed evidence of a
dislocated jaw. All three corpses had had their skulls pierced
with a large hole, and the breast of each was opened. Experts
studying the corpses believe this happened when the bodies
were robbed, in order to unwrap the bandages faster and take
the amulets and jewelry.
The second side chamber contained nine more bodies, with
their wrappings intact, but placed in a variety of ramshackle
coffins. Loret soon discovered cartouches on the coffins, and
realized that he had found yet another royal cache. He
determined that the mummies had been re-buried into the tomb
of Amenhotep II at the turn of the 2nd millennium
BCE. At that time, Amenhotep II himself had also been
"restored." However, everything of any value had
been stripped from the coffins.
Amenhotep II was there, of course, in his red quartzite
sarcophagus but placed in a coffin inscribed for the much
later king Ramesses III, and covered with a lid inscribed for
Seti II; Tutmosis IV was there, and
Merenptah in the lower
part of a coffin inscribed for Setnakht, Seti II,
Siptah,
Ramesses IV, Ramesses V and Ramesses
VI. The last of these
mummies was an anonymous female lying on the upturned lid of a
coffin inscribed for Setnakht. The heads of Siptah, Seti II,
Ramesses IV, Ramesses VI and possibly even Ramesses V all bore
similar cranial holes to those found on the bodies of Siptah
and the others.
In early 1901, the guards watching over this tomb were
overpowered, and the tomb itself rifled once again. The mummy
that had been laid in the boat vanished, and the mummy of
Amenhotep II itself was unwrapped, the amulets and jewels
stolen and one arm even torn off.
A footnote to all this: The inspector who had traced the
robberies of Amenhotep II’s cache was Howard
Carter. He
resigned from the Antiquities Service in 1903, but remained in
Luxor. Here he met Lord Carnarvon, and four years later they
formed a partnership to begin digging.
Sources:
- Tutankhamen, Life of a Pharaoh, by Christiane
Desroches-Noblecourt
- Mummies, Myth and Magic by Christine el Mahdy
- The Complete Valley of the Kings by Nicholas Reeves
- World of the Pharaohs by Christine Hobson
- Ancient Egypt: The Great Discoveries by Nicholas Reeves
Marie Parsons is an ardent student of Egyptian archaeology, ancient history and its religion.
To learn about the earliest civilization is to learn about ourselves. Marie welcomes comments
to marieparsons@prodigy.net.
Archives
|