|
Unlike our modern religions, ancient Egyptian religion was
not based on a set of theological principles, nor did it
really depend on the content of canonical writings. Rather, it
evolved around how people interacted with their gods, and
these actions are termed by Egyptologists as "cult",
which is roughly synonymous with "ritual". In the
ancient Egyptian language, there is no specific word for
"ritual". They variously referred to these
interactions with the gods as irt ht (doing things), irw
(things done) or nt (regular procedures).
Cults were focused on ntr, which since the Ptolemaic
(Greek) period has been translated as god. However, the
ancient Egyptians applied this term to people and things which
we today would hesitate to call gods. In fact, Dimitri Meeks
has recently suggested that the common feature of all entities
called ntr by the ancient Egyptians is that they were the
beneficiaries of ritual. However, we might better define these
entities by separating them into several classes.
First of all, there were of course beings who originally
existed as gods. Rituals served to preserve their existence as
gods through providing them with sustenance and other
benefits. The second class were entities that became ntr
through ritual. This general category can be further divided
between those who became ntr during their lifetimes, and those
who became ntr after death. Examples of the first type include
the king and special animals who were thought to be
manifestations of the gods. Examples of those who became ntr
after death include various common people who became deified,
the most famous of which was probably Imhotep, and mummified
animals.
In order to conduct the cult of the gods, the Egyptians
constructed religious facilities that remain some of the most
elaborate structures ever built. These temples were called by
the ancient Egyptians, hwt-ntr, meaning "the house of the
god". These temples actually usually served several gods,
and in order to sustain these cult activities, considerable
resources, such as extensive networks of land, livestock and
personnel were required. These necessary resources that were
required to support the activities of a temple were referred
to as r-pr, meaning "temple estate".
Most temples prior to the New Kingdom appear to have not
survived. Scholars sometimes attribute this to their
construction using perishable materials, which is probably
true of the earliest of these structures. However, it is also
likely that materials from well built temples of, for example
the Middle
Kingdom, may have often been reused in later
building projects. Nevertheless, beginning with the New
Kingdom and continuing through the Greco-Roman periods, the
Egyptians built enormous stone temples that provide us with
our primary source of information on cult activity.
We know that important Egyptian temples employed a large
number of priests and servants who performed a wide variety of
tasks. Theoretically, only the king, who was the only living
person in Egypt considered to have the status of ntr, could
officiate in the cult before the gods. It was he who was
considered to be the high priest of all the gods and goddesses
of Egypt, and on who's shoulder's fell the responsibility for
their contentment. However, in reality the king delegated to
the various priesthoods who served the gods the responsibility
of their welfare. Though many major priestly appointments were
made by the king himself, others could be made by local
officials, and at various times during Egyptian history,
priestly offices could be inherited.
Priests
were usually divided into four groups that were
called "gangs of the service", to which the Greeks
gave the name, phyles. Each group served one lunar month in
rotation, so that during the year each one served for three
months with three months off between months of service. This
actually allowed some priests to hold priesthoods in several
temples. In the mature ancient Egyptian cult, there were two
main classes of priests. Those of the highest class were
called hm-ntr, meaning "god's servant". They
functioned in the presences of the god's statue, and the
Greeks translated hm-ntr as "prophet", because it
was these priests who interpreted the oracles of the gods. The
chief priests of a temple were designated by ordinal numbers
and so the high priest of a temple was called hm-ntr tpy, or
"first prophet". In some temple cults, the high
priest received special titles. For example, the high priest
of Ptah was called "he who is great at directing the
crafts, while the high priest of Re was "he who is great
at seeing. The high priest of Thoth was "the arbitrator
between the two" and that of Khnum was "the modeler
of limbs".
The lower class of priests
were called the "pure
ones". They served such functions such as carrying the
god's bark, pouring water for libations during temple
services, as overseers of craftsmen, artisans or scribes, or
as craftsmen themselves, producing sacred objects for the
cult. There was also a third class of priest known as it-ntr,
or "god's father". It has been suggested that these
priests were senior members of the lower class priesthood who
had perhaps reached the level of prophet, but who were not yet
formally inducted into that office. At least one of their
functions seems to have been to walk in front of the god's
image in processions and sprinkle water to purify the
path.
Some priests
were also specialists. For example, the hry-hb
who "he who carries the festival roll", and it was
his responsibility for reading the hymns and spells which
accompanied many rituals. The "scribe of the house of
life" was given the duty of copying the papyri used in
temple and funerary rituals.
During the Old
Kingdom, women could hold the office of
priestess (hmt-ntr) of Hathor or
Neith. However, they rarely
served as priestess in the cult of a male god. Before the New
Kingdom, the office of priest was not considered a full-time
position, but with the later introduction of the professional
priest, women could no longer hold priestly titles. Mainly,
they served as musicians, singers and dancers of the cult.
Later, however, they could hold a vary prestigious title at Thebes, known as the
Divine
Adoratress, which was a prominent
position indeed.
The continued existence and prosperity of Egypt was
considered to depend on the successful performance of cult
activities, carried out by the priesthood in the temple. At
the very point of creation, the ancient Egyptians believed
that there was a small space of order that appeared in the
midst of chaos. Only within the space of this order was life
possible, and in order to keep chaos from engulfing the
created world, it was necessary to perform the cult of the
gods. These cult activities primarily consisted of rituals
that were conducted on a daily basis, and those carried out
periodically during specific
festivals.
The focus of all the cult activity was usually a statue of
the god known as an "image". These were usually
small objects, averaging about 50 centimeters (22 inches) in
height, that resided in a naos or bark shrine in the chapel of
the temple's inner sanctuary. Made of wood, stone, or
sometimes precious metals, since most temples housed more than
god, they also contained more than one cult statue. However,
these statues were usually produced with only the most
permanent or symbolically significant materials. The skin of
the gods was considered to be pure gold, so divine images were
often gilded or made entirely with this precious metal. The
hair of the gods was said to be like lapis lazuli, so this was
the semi precious stone that was often inset into statues of
deities to signify their hair and eyebrows.
Like the
mummies of the deceased, once these statues were completed by
the craftsmen, they underwent a ritual called the
"Opening of the Mouth", which transformed the
statue, allowing it to be used by the god to manifest itself
and in which the divine ka and ba could take up residence.
However, it should be noted that the statue itself was not the
subject of worship. They were simply one means by which the
gods could receive worship.
At any particular point in time, the daily temple ritual
took essentially the same form in every temple in Egypt. This
ritual evolved from that for the sun god Re
at Heliopolis,
which evolved around the rebirth of the sun each morning.
Elements of the Osirian belief were later incorporated into
this daily ritual, symbolizing the restoration and
revivification of the dismembered body of Osiris. For the
purpose of the ritual, the cult-statue became to be identified
as both Re and Osiris.
Our understanding of these rituals comes basically from two
main sources, which include the temple reliefs that depict the
king performing the various tasks of the ceremony, and papyri
that list the rituals and the hymns which accompany them.
Though these sources have allowed scholars to reconstruct the
various events of the daily ritual, they do not provide the
sequence of activities.
However, we might suppose that before dawn, two priests
may
have been responsible for filling containers with water from
the sacred well of the temple and replenishing all of the
libation vessels. In the kitchens, priests would have been
busy preparing offerings for the gods. The main officiating
priest, a hm-ntr, would then go to the "house of the
morning" where he would be ceremonially purified,
dressed, given a light meal, and prepare to conduct the
morning ceremony.
As the sun rose, the bolt was drawn back and the door
opened to the shrine that contained the god's image. Since
only the king was considered to be able to confront the god,
as the officiating priest approached the statue, he would
declare that "it is the king who has sent me to see the
god". Now the priest prostrated himself before the image,
and the chapel was ritually purified with water and incense
before a small figure of the goddess Ma'at was presented to
the god, symbolizing the proper order established for the
world at creation.
Next, the image of the god was probably removed from its
shrine, and the clothing and ointment provided the statue the
previous day were removed. We believe that the statue was
placed on a pile of clean sand and the shrine was then
purified with water and incense. The image of the god would
then be adorned with green and black eye paint, as well as
anointed with several oils. The statue was then dressed in
clothes that were colored white, green, blue and red. The
white and red cloths would protect the god from his enemies,
while the blue hid his face and the green ensured his health.
The god's image was then presented with his regalia, such as
crowns, scepter, crook, flail and wsh-collar.
Finally, the face of the statue would be anointed, sand
scattered around the chapel and the statue replaced in its
shrine, before the door was once more bolted and sealed. As
the priest performed the final purifications and left the
sanctuary, he would drag behind him a broom in order to
obliterate his own footsteps.
Though at what point it took place is unclear, at some time
during the morning ritual, the offering would take place. This
provided the god with his "breakfast, and may have occurred
before the final purification of the chapel in preparation for
placing the statue in the shrine. Other scholars believe it
may have taken place before the undressing and dressing of the
statue. Though an enormous meal consisting of meat, bread,
cakes, beer, milk, honey, vegetables and fruit was prepared
for this purpose, only a small, symbolic portion of it was
actually placed before the statue. There was an offering
formula listing the various items that was recited by
the priest, and incense was burned and libations made in order
to purify and sanctify the offerings. Of course, the god did
not actually consume the offerings, but rather took from them
their essence, so they could be shared with the other deities
of the temple.
In fact, the offerings were also used in the ritual of the
royal ancestors, where they were provided to the king's royal
predecessors, often depicted in the form of a list of their
names. Next, the offerings were finally provided to the
statues of other individuals found in the temple, before
ultimately becoming the property of the priests. The priests
received a share of the offerings based on their rank, and
this was one manner in which the priests were compensated for
their service.
Though the morning ritual was the primary ceremony of the
day, there were also less elaborate ceremonies that took place
at noon and in the evening. However, during these services,
the doors of the god's chapel were not opened. They consisted
mainly of pouring water libations and burning incense before
the shrines of the gods.
There were other rituals that were performed throughout the
night and day, consisting mostly of apotropaic dramatic
rituals meant to repel threats against the gods. Frequently,
these threats originated in the form of Seth, the murderer of
Osiris, or Apophis, the serpent who tried to stop the daily
voyage of Re thereby bringing an end to creation. On
Re's
behalf, hymns were sung during the twelve hours of the day and
the twelve hours of the night to protect Re on his journey.
Images of these enemies were created from wax or clay and then
destroyed, thereby bringing about the enemies destruction
through magic.
There were also a number of festivals (hbw) that were
celebrated throughout the year, though their nature could vary
considerably over Egyptian history. Workers, as evidenced by
records at Deir
el-Medina, were given days off for festivals.
During the reign of Tuthmosis
III, we know that in the temple
of Amun-Re at Karnak, some fifty-four festivals were held, and
at Ramesses
III's temple at Medinet Habu, sixty festival days
were celebrated. Some of these festivals were small, but
others could last as many as twenty-seven days and require
large expenditures of food and beverages for participants.
Records recording one festival related to Sokar record that
3,694 loaves of bread, 410 cakes and 905 jars of beer were
distributed.
Some of the more important of these festivals include the
celebrations for New Year's Day, the festival of Osiris at
Abydos, during which the "mysteries" of this god
were celebrated, the festival of Hathor, when her statue was
bought before the royal cult complex and the festival of the
Coronation of the Sacred Falcon of Edfu. There was also the
Beautiful Festival of the Valley during which the statue of
Amun-Re was taken from Karnak to the temple at
Deir el-Bahri,
as well as other royal cult complexes on the west bank of the
Nile River (particularly that of the reigning king). This was also a
celebration for the people, who would visit the tombs of their
relatives and observe an all-night vigil where they shared a
feat with their deceased relatives.
During the festivals, the focus remained on the statue
image of the god, but the statue would now be housed in bark
shrines. The Egyptian gods always traveled in boats. Sometimes
the boat was real, when the god traveled on water, but at
other times the bark was a symbolic boat carried over land on
the shoulders of priests. During these festivals, the journey
could be as short as a procession through the temple, or the
god could leave the temple to visit another deity some
distance away. The bark shrine was carried along processional
avenues which were often lined with sphinxes. Along the way,
essentially open-ended buildings were placed as stations on
which the priests could rest the bark. At these points, the
priests would perform fumigations and provide libations and
hymns to the god's image.
These festivals and processions provided the general
population with access to the gods, which was otherwise not
available, since the farthest most people were admitted into
the temples was the open forecourt. Though most scholars
believe that the bark shrine was closed during these
processions, hiding the image from the onlookers, Dirk van der
Plass argued that numerous texts describe the desire of people
so see the image of the god, and therefore believes that the
shrine was left open. The ancient Egyptians believed that
individuals could be healed of various illness by beholding
the god's image.
People could also approach the gods during festivals in
order to seek an oracle, though the first clear evidence for
oracles only occurs as early as the New Kingdom. However, John
Baines has suggested that evidence for the existence of
oracles may exist as early as the First Intermediate Period,
and that even earlier examples may exist. This practice
consisted of placing questions with simple yes or no answers
written out on small flakes of limestone or ostraca before the
gods. These were often questions regarding relatively everyday
matters. The movement of the bark-shrine carried on the
shoulders of the priests
indicated affirmative, if moved
forward, nor negative if the priests moved the shrine back.
It should be noted that not all cult worship took place in
the normal temple environment. Though during the New Kingdom a
type of public chapel, known as a "Chapel of the Hearing
Ear" was sometimes built into the rear of regular temples
for the general public, there also came to exist, particularly
during the New Kingdom, sites at
Amarna and Deir el-Medina
that evidence public chapels which would have
contained either a small cult statue, or more commonly a stela
with an image of the god. Areas in some private homes were
even set aside for worship. At Amarna, upper-class homes had
domestic shrines containing statues of Akhenaten and his
family, or stelae showing the royal family venerating the Aten
(sun disk). Also, many of the houses at Deir el-Medina
contained household shrines consisting of a wall niche which
could be equipped with an offering table or libation trough.
Such areas might be found in any room, including the kitchen.
Popular gods for such shrines included Mertseger,
Renenutet,
Sobek, Amun,
Taweret and
Hathor, though deceased relatives
were frequently worshipped as the "able spirit of
Re".
Small, public chapels were usually served by lay priests,
but we have little information about the cult practices in
these, or in home shrines. Doubtless, offerings of food,
libations and incense were made, but what other forms of
rituals took place is unknown. These shrines served as places
where people could make specific requests of their gods in
prayer.
See also:
References:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt, The |
Wilkinson, Richard H. |
2003 |
Thames & Hudson, LTD |
ISBN 0-500-05120-8 |
|
Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses, A |
Hart, George |
1986 |
Routledge |
ISBN 0-415-05909-7 |
|
Egyptian Religion |
Morenz, Siegfried |
1973 |
Cornell University Press |
ISBN 0-8014-8029-9 |
|
Gods and Myths of Ancient Egypt |
Armour, Robert A. |
1986 |
American University in Cairo Press, The |
ISBN 977 424 669 1 |
|
Gods of the Egyptians, The (Studies in Egyptian Mythology) |
Budge, E. A. Wallis |
1969 |
Dover Publications, Inc. |
ISBN 486-22056-7 |
Archives
|