
The ruins at Ain Umm Dabadib (Ain Umm el-Dabadib) in the
Kharga Oasis are actually very
extensive. Located about 20 kilometers west of Qaser el-Leabekha and about 40
kilometers north of
Qaser
Kharga, this is a remote region of the oasis which lay on the Darb Ain Amur,
the ancient route to the
Dakhla
Oasis. It is one of the more adventurous places to visit, absolutely
requiring a guide just to find its location.
The site is probably best known for its fortress which is situated in a most
spectacular setting. It is nestled in at the base of an escarpment that is about
380 meters above sea level and 225 meters above the desert floor.
This was an important settlement for thousands of years, and the ruins of
Dabadib stretch over some 60,000 acres where three major desert tracks converge
on the plain. One track led from the fortress of
el-Leabekha past Ain Umm
Dabadib and continued on westward towards Ain Amur and the
Dakhla Oasis. Another cross
the plain directly heading towards the
Hibis Temple, while
the third track crossed through Ain Umm Dabadib and headed northwestwards over
the escarpment, eventually leading to a route connecting the Nile Valley with
the Dakhla Oasis. It was probably the Romans who established a major settlement
here, though the complicated aqueduct system suggests that it was inhabited and
functional long before them.
The towing fortress at Ain Umm Dabadib is located about one half kilometers
southeast of the ruins of the town. The enclosure wall surrounds an area of from
90 to 100 square meters. It is very unusual for its square towers, which flank
the entrance on the south. However, like other fortresses in the
Kharga Oasis, it is made of
mudbrick which are fairly uniform in size, measuring 35 by 17 by 9 centimeters.
Because of its rectangular towers, some scholars believe that the fortress is
of later date than those with rounded towers in the various oasis. The tallest
of the Dabadib towers, on the south-western corner, still contains the remains
of a spiral staircase and rises to a current height of about 15 meters. Smaller
buildings were crowded around its southern and western walls. While the interior
of the fortress is now ruined, several vaulted chambers at ground level are
still intact.
There are also the ruins of a
Christian
church, complete with several arches, which abuts the east side of the
fortress. The aspe contained Greek, Coptic and Arabic graffiti. Regrettably,
however, though the church was still mostly standing in 1997, it was only
recently very damaged by an imbecile on a forklift seeking treasure. This is a
problem that continues in some of these remote sites.
While the site may best be known for its somewhat unusual fortress, really
the most spectacular ruins at Ain Umm Dabadib are the aqueducts. The Ain Umm
Dabadib aqueducts were explored by Ball in 1898 and Beadnell in 1898 and 1905.
They were also visited by Ahmed Fakhry in the 1930s. In 1905 when Beadnell
explored the a tunnel that had been cleared out by villagers from
Kharga, he found that it was
still flowed with some thirty to thirty-five gallons per minute of water. The
shaft that he explored measured 1.5 by .75 meters and was cut through solid
sandstone rock to a depth of 40 meters. It led to a tunnel measuring about 1.5
meters high by 60 centimeters wide at the top. It was halt and sultry, but after
a few attempts, Beadnell traced it to its end hoping to find an inscription that
would date the construction and provide some clue to its builders. However, one
should think twice about following his exploration. He tells us that:
"On more than one occasion, I sank exhausted into the water, the huge
gasps of breath which I took seeming powerless to relieve the horrible
sensation of stifling, and with the unpleasant prospect of getting drowned
if I escaped suffocation. yet there seemed to be ten thousand devils
tempting me onwards, and although I did not know how long life could be
supported under such conditions, a mad desire possessed me to see the thing
through; so that whenever I was able to progress a few yards it was toward
the head of the tunnel."
These shafts are dangerous, and appear to contain snakes, scorpions and bats,
and in the end, Beadnell found nothing.
Today, these aqueducts are still intact, snaking north from the town to the
water source in the escarpment. They are by far the best example of such
elaborate aqueducts in the Kharga
Oasis. Along the route, every few meters, is an air vent and access hole
which permitted maintenance of the underground galleries. This was necessary
because they were always filling with sand which had to be cleared out.
Of course, a large settlement needed a constant water supply, and here,
during antiquity, an extensive 14.3 kilometers, twisting and turning underground
system of galleries was created. There are five main aqueducts that run parallel
to each other with main holes for maintenance along each of them. The longest of
these is the westerly one stretching some 4.6 kilometers. The one to the north
runs 2.9 kilometers and is 53.5 meters deep. It has 150 shafts spaced about 19
to 20 meters apart. It descends about one meter for every 2.5 meters in length.
Combined, the builders excavated some 4,875 cubic meters of earth, digging 600
to 700 vertical shafts, and cut and moved over 20,000 meters of solid rock. This
was an amazing feat of construction.
There remains many questions about the aqueduct systems in the Western
Desert. This one, due to its design and manner of construction, was probably
begun by the Persians. However, some scholars have suggested an even earlier
date for some aqueducts.
Ahmed Fakhry
discovered in the Bahariya
that the aqueduct was in place before a
26th Dynasty tomb was dug.
Nevertheless, the Romans did extensive work on water systems in the Western
desert, constructing huge cisterns along the northern coast and underground
galleries and aqueducts in most of the oasis. Yet, none of the Roman work really
resembles, or is as sophisticated, what we find at Ain Umm Dabadib. hey are
closer in deign to the systems found in Libya and Algeria, as well as those in
Iran (Persia) Afghanistan, Oman and China.
Apparently, water is still available at Ain Umm Dabadib, and from time to
time over the years, farmers have attempted to clear the wells and re-cultivate
the land. However, keeping the
channels clear of sand seems to be very labor
intensive, and so these efforts have so far failed.
Lying to the west of the fortress, along the channel of the more westerly
aqueduct as it makes its way toward the mountain are the substantial remains of
a village bordered to its west by a number of sunt trees. Another portion of the
town, known as the Eastern Village, lies directly behind the fortress. It
contains a number of ruined mudbrick buildings.
The fortified town appears to consist of many luxurious houses, sometimes up
to three stories high, which ware currently being studied by the team
undertaking the north Kharga Oasis
Survey. Recent discoveries in the area include a possible mill and s small
hermitage. Reportedly, this area continues to be covered in potshards.
Beyond the village is a very small temple, easily recognized by its walls
that slant inward from the base. The temple has a pylon-shaped design at the
front, though within its vaulted ceilings are more typical of Roman-Byzantine
architecture. The temple contains some hieroglyphs and scenes of Egyptian
deities, though there are also some Coptic inscriptions and traces of red
paint.
Just beside the temple is the second aqueduct. To the east of it, past some
vegetation, is the third aqueduct sitting at the base of a spur of the
escarpment.
Ten different cemeteries have been identified at Ain Umm Dabadib by the NKOS
team, which includes both rock-cut and shallow graves. Some of the tombs were
lined with mudbricks and some showed remains of mudbrick facades. The variation
in tombs, carved rock and painted prick suggest that all classes of society
lived in proximity. Some of these cemeteries appear to span as many as ten
generations. To the east of the third aqueduct, all along the spur, are rock cut
tombs. Some of them have been desecrated, with the remains of their mummies
scattered about (though now this has been cleaned up). NKOS are currently
studying the methods of mummification, but the mummies may be of Roman origin,
NKOS researchers say. They still contain the brain, and the salt-dried bodies
were covered in oils and wrapped in pink, red, yellow and natural-colored linen
bandages. Researchers have also identified Roman mummy makes by their plaster
curls and eyebrow fragments.
Unfortunately, Ain Umm Dabadib has historically failed to attract
archaeologists, though in 1998, excavations was finally begun. There will be
doubtless much that we will learn. Prehistoric remains have also been located
here, and it is possible that the site was occupied sporadically from these
early times, though its present importance is in providing valuable information
covering the transitional period between Pagan and Christian Egypt.
The area is also very interesting Geologically. Dry river channels are
evident as they fall from the escarpment onto the plain below, leading one to
suspect that waterfalls may have existed here in the distant past. The plain is
actually a playa, a dried up lake
Resources:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Atlas of Ancient Egypt |
Baines, John; Malek, Jaromir |
1980 |
Les Livres De France |
None Stated |
|
Encyclopedia of Ancient Egyptian Architecture, The |
Arnold, Dieter |
2003 |
Princeton University Press |
ISBN 0-691-11488-9 |
|
Western Desert of Egypt, The |
Vivian, Cassandra |
2000 |
American University in Cairo Press, The |
ISBN 977 424 527 X |