The earliest depictions we have of Egyptian kings portray the
motif of prostrate foreigners as a symbol of Egyptian
supremacy over the rest of mankind. For example, the Narmer
Palette shows
the king in
his efforts to rid the world of such aberrations as the
"vile Asiatic". Here, we find the trampling of the
"Nine Bows", as the Egyptian referred to their
enemies, as a vivid embodiment of the king's supremacy over foreigners
(and sometimes even other Egyptians). The figure
"nine" represented three times three, which was the
"plurality of Pluralities", thus designating the
entirety of all enemies. And later, during the New
Kingdom, the Sphinx Stele of Amenhotep
II provides a striking textual description of the Egyptian
King smiting his enemies:
"He bound the heads of the Nine Bows... He has
gathered them all into his fist, his mace has crashed upon
their heads..."
Hence, the visual image of the king slaughtering foreigners
was an important, as well as constantly repeated element of
Egyptian iconography throughout the empires ancient history.
With the cane from the tomb of Tutankhamun
now in the Egyptian
Antiquities Museum in Cairo,
we find a very symbolic reference to Egypt's traditional
enemies. Carved on its handle are the heads of a Nubian and an
Asiatic, and indeed, these embody the Egyptian air of
symmetry. Egyptians saw the Asiatics and the Nubians as the
two opposite poles of a hostile world
outside the Nile valley. In fact, they sometimes simply
referred to these enemies as the North and the South.
Actually, just about everyone outside the Nile Valley was
considered enemies of Egypt, for those were the lands of chaos.
The visual depiction of Egypt's enemies and their role became
so prevalent that it is difficult to distinguish in the archaeological
and textual sources between purely ritualistic and rhetorical
references to foreigners and genuine historical records.
Repeatedly, we find examples of battles, and king's smiting
enemies that in fact, did not take place, but were mere copies
of earlier scenes.
The Execration Texts, which dates from the Old
and Middle
Kingdoms, is one of the most important souses for
information on the specific names of Egypt's enemies. They
were discovered near tombs at Thebes
and Saqqara, as
well as in the "ritual site" at Mirgissa in Nubia.
Those found in Nubia even included one example of such text
inscribed on a human skull. Written in the hieratic
script on small pottery vessels and clay figures of bound
captives, these text listed the hostile foreigners, places,
groups of people or individuals that the Egyptians wished
thought to be inherently evil and wished to destroy. The
objects were then deliberately broken and buried, inflicting a
magical victory over these enemies. The names listed in these
texts include deceased Egyptians, as well as foreign princes
and peoples mostly in Nubia
and Syria-Palestine. However, it is clear that these lists
name both old and new enemies, which were mixed together,
forming a powerful universal statement about the way in which
Egypt viewed the outside world.

Foreigners from Ramesses III Temple at
Medinet Habu
Factually, Egypt had two forms of enemies. The first type
of enemy was held valuable resources that the Egyptians
sought. Except for the Nubians, they were usually not a threat
to Egypt as invaders. These enemies included the empires such
as Mitanni, Hatti. Other enemies mostly possessed little that
Egypt wished to have, but were a direct threat to Egypt as an
invading force. These enemies included the Libyans and the Sea
People.
The Nubians
During almost the entire Dynastic Period of Egypt's
history, the Nubians (or Nehesyw) were considered by the
Egyptians to be "vile" and "wretched". The
official view of the Nubians was clear from a Middle Kingdom
boundary stele of Senusret
III from Smna which denounces them:
"They are not people one respects; they are
wretches, craven hearted. My majesty has seen it, it is not
an untruth. I have captured their women, I have carried off
their dependents..."
Military
campaigns and trading expeditions were sent to Nubia at
regular intervals in order to sustain a regular supply of
prisoners, herds of cattle and exotic products from the south
such as ivory, ostrich feathers and ebony. And of course there
were also the mining operations in Nubia, where the Egyptian's
obtained much of their gold. Many of these expeditions were
recorded in the tombs of the nobles at Elephantine
(at modern Aswan).
However, by the New Kingdom, Nubia had effectively become a
province of Egypt, at least between Aswan and Napata, under
the control of a viceroy known as "King's Son of Kush".
Yet even then, the iconography of the Nubian as a defeated
enemy never lost its popularity as a symbol of Egyptian supremacy.
Even during the Meroitic Period, when the Nubian's controlled
Egypt with A Nubian as Pharaoh, this motif of the defeated
Nubian was still depicted in the royal regalia, with no
apparent sense of contradiction.
The Libyans
The Libyans were known to the Egyptians as the Tjehenu or
Tjemehu, though they may have been composed of more than one
race of people. They were depicted by the Egyptians mostly as
dark skinned and bearded, though occasionally with fair hair
and blue eyes. A semi nomadic people, the Libyans occupied the
lands to the northwest of the Nile Valley. Even during the
predynastic period, temple reliefs frequently show them as a
defeated enemy, and there are records from the reigns of the
Old Kingdom pharaohs Snefru
and Sahure
of specific campaigns against them.
The
Libyans, like the Nubians, were by the time of the Old
Kingdom, a symbol of the King's military
prowess. The reliefs in the Old Kingdom mortuary
temples of Sahure at Abusir
and Pepi
II at Saqqara, as well as the Late
Period temple of Taharqa
at Kawa, include stock scenes of a Libyan chief being smitten
by the pharaoh, while the victim's wife and children beg for
mercy. However, the personal names for the Libyans in all
three scenes are repetitions and therefore suggest that these
reliefs did not actually record historical events, but were
rather an elaborate icon of Kingship. However, it is also
clear that at intervals, the Egyptians had to undertake
punitive campaigns against the Libyans. In fact, during the
New Kingdom reigns of Merneptah
and Ramesses
III, the Egyptians had to stave off major invasions from
Libyans.
However, the Libyans, as well as other foreign captives,
were often being settled in military colonies by the late New
Kingdom, and these people, known as Meshwesh, eventually
became an influential group within Egyptian society. In fact,
by the 22nd
Dynasty, they even gained temporary control of Egypt.
The Hyksos
During the Old and Middle Kingdoms there seem to have been
little military contact of any significance with Western Asia.
However, after the Middle Kingdom, during the Second
Intermediate Period, Egypt was ruled by a dynasty of Asiatic
kings known as the Hyksos. The term Hyksos really refers
simply to the "rulers of foreign lands". They came
to Egypt with horses, chariots
and copper weapons,
which the Egyptians would later adapt for their own armies.
The were expelled from Egypt by King
Ahmose, but this interlude of foreign rule in Egypt
resulted in a new, aggressive policy of imperialism in
Syria-Palestine. This would eventually bring Egypt's New
Kingdom pharaohs into direct confrontation with the great
powers beyond the Levant, including first Mitanni and then
Hatti and Assyria.
Mitanni, Hatti and Assyria
Most
of Egypt's conflicts with the Asiatic enemies revolved around
Egypt's attempted control the Syrian area of Canaan, and the
various city states of that region along the Mediterranean
coast north of the Sinai.
At first, it would seem that the conflicts within Syria with
these various enemies of Egypt were to provide a buffer zone
for Egypt's defense. However, like Mitanni and Hittites, Egypt's
prolonged interest in the region derived from their desire to dominate
and exploit the economic resources and trade. During the New
Kingdom, Syria was the crossroads of world commerce, with
goods from the Aegean and beyond entering the Near East by way
of ports such as Ugarit. When one considers the inherent
fertility and richness in natural resources, Syria obviously
offered much to the predatory powers who sought to use this
wealth for their own purposes. Hence, some thirty-thee
centuries ago, "world power" was synonymous with the
control of Syria, so it is not surprising that for nearly two
hundred years, the great powers of Egypt, Mitanni and Hatti
expended much blood and treasure in wars designed to ensure
their respective control of this vitally strategic region.
The Sea People
Even as Egypt was vying for a powerful position in Syria,
there was apparently a disturbance along the Mediterranean
coast that displaced whole nations of people. This disturbance
was to effect all of the powers of the region, as these people
moved about the lands. They became collectively known as the
"People of the Sea", who today we simply call the Sea
People. As they invaded the lands of the Levant, the
bought with them their families, cattle and household possessions,
with the clear intent to settle Some of these people have been
identified as the Sherden, Sheklesh, Lukka, Tursha and
Akawasha.
There were several waves of these people, invading
Egypt. At first, they reached as far south as the Farafra
Oasis and the Canopic branch of the Nile. They advanced on
Egypt by both land and sea, and represented a desperate threat
to the Egyptians and other powers of the region.
Persia and the End of the Dynastic Period
As Egypt's Dynastic Period drew to an end, it was not the
traditional enemies that finally brought down this great
empire, but rather a succession of new enemies. It was first
the Persians, who were so offensive to the Egyptians that when
Alexander the
Great arrived in Egypt, he seems to have been welcomed as
a liberator. While Egypt would carry on a dynastic tradition
with the arrival of the Ptolomies, there would never again be
a true Egyptian Pharaoh with his own enemies to smite.
References:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Armies of the Pharaohs |
Healy, Mark |
1992 |
Osprey Publishing |
ISBN 1 85532 939 5 |
|
Dictionary of Ancient Egypt, The |
Shaw, Ian; Nicholson, Paul |
1995 |
Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers |
ISBN 0-8109-3225-3 |
|
Egyptian Treasures from the Egyptian Museum in Cairo |
Tiradritti, Francesco, Editor |
1999 |
Harry N. Abrams, Inc. |
ISBN 0-8109-3276-8 |
|
Egyptian Warfare and Weapons |
Shaw, Ian |
1991 |
Shire Publications LTD |
ISBN 0 7478 0142 8 |
|
History of Ancient Egypt, A |
Grimal, Nicolas |
1988 |
Blackwell |
None Stated |
|
Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, The |
Shaw, Ian |
2000 |
Oxford University Press |
ISBN 0-19-815034-2 |
|
Warrior Pharaoh, The: Rameses II and the Battle of Qadesh |
Healy, Mark |
1993 |
Osprey Publishing |
ISBN 1 84176 039 0 |
Archives
|