Tulun
himself was a Turkish slave from Bokhara who was given to
Caliph Mamun in 815 AD as a present. Afterwards, he became a
powerful and influential person in the court of Mamun,
allowing his son Ahmad Ibn Tulun (ibn means son of) to be well
educated in the best traditions of Islamic law and government.
As a young man, Ahmad was a loyal servant to his caliph in
Samarra (north of modern Baghdad), Mesopotamia and when his
father died and his stepfather was given Egypt as a sort of
private estate by the caliph, Ahmad Ibn Tulun was sent to
administer the country.
Ibn Tulun's appointment as prefect of Egypt came in 868 and
at the end of a long period of political strife. The
Bashmurite rebellion of 832 in the Nile
River delta between the river's Rosetta and Damietta
branches was the last and most violent of the Christian
uprisings in Egypt. Caliph Mamun himself has spend forty-nine
days in Egypt taking part in its suppression. Maqrizi, a well
known historian of that period, says that, "From then on,
the Copts were obedient and their power was destroyed once and
for all; none were able to rebel or even oppose the government,
and the Muslims gained a majority in the villages". In
853 the Byzantines successfully attacked Damietta, and then
from 866 to 868 AD and Arab-led revolt smoldered in a vast
region of the delta and Fayoum.
When he arrived in Askar-Fustat (which would one day spawn Cairo),
at about the age of thirty-three, it is said that he was
unable to even pay his way from Baghdad to Egypt. He had to
borrow ten thousand dinars to set himself up in his new
position. That soon changed, however, for by 870 he was well
enough off to build his own capital, because old el Askar was
too small for his entourage of soldiers, ministers, wives and
slaves.
Ibn Tulun created a small kingdom of his own out of a
united Egypt and Syria, which he captured in 878, and with
this combination behind him he almost conquered Mecca. For the
first time since the Roman conquest, Egypt would constitute,
in the reign of Ibn Tulun and his successors, an autonomous
state, albeit under Abbasid suzerainty. The caliphate was
weak, and it was obviously silly to Ibn Tulun to send all his
Egyptian revenue east. Hence, much of the revenue was kept in
Egypt for the first time in many hundreds of years. Fustat at
this time remained an important and large trading port between
Egypt and the east, and Ibn Tulun was intelligent enough to
keep this trade active. Therefore, he gained the money and
power to build his new capital.
He built this city on a little knoll of high ground between
Fustat and the Mukattam Hills, called Yeshkur. The political
power of the Tulunids, the flowering of their art and the pomp
of their court life were expressed in this new capital. Today,
this area of the city is not difficult to find, for atop
the little hill Ibn Tulun built his famous mosque which has
survived the devastations of time. The new city was built just
northeast of el Askar and its boundaries were the Mosque
of Ibn Tulun on the east, Birkat al-Fil (Pond of the
Elephant) to the north and the sanctuary of Zayn el Abidin to
the south. It has been estimated that the new city took up
some 270 hectares of land.
It is said that this was a Christian cemetery where Moses
was supposed to have had a conversation with God, and where
Abraham slew his sacrifice. Muslims considered it a holy
place, since Christians and Jews were both respected by Islam
as "people of the Book". However, Ibn Tulun cleared
the Christian graves from the area and built his royal capital
around the hill. This new town was divided into special katais
(districts) for each segment of the population who came there
to live. Each of these districts was then named according to
the kind of population, consisting of servants, soldiers,
guards, Romans (actually Greeks) or Nubians. Hence, the city
was called Katai (al-Qatai, the districts, the wards or the
plots). This by the way was a tradition from Samarra, which
was likewise divided into districts. There, Ibn Tulun built a
palace (qasr) at the foot of the Mukattam Hills, a garden, a
racecourse and polo grounds, a zoo, a palace for his wives,
baths, a hospital and rich houses for his staff. A road led
from the palace and the square to the mosque and the
"Main Avenue (Shari el Azam), which possibly coincides
with that would become Saliba Street. Now the city that
would become Cairo consisted of three
capitals built by three rulers, consisting of Askar, Fustat
and Katai, and with Ibn Tulun, it began to take on the
decorative style that made it a genuinely fabulous
place.
The nerve center of this new royal city was his Midan el
Katai, which was a huge square which extended more or less
from the present citadel right up to the hill of Yeshkur. This
square may occupy today what is Rumayla Square. Ibn Tulun was
a great horseman and an enthusiastic soldier, so he used the
midan for parades and polo, and the historian Makrizi says
that everybody in Fustat loved this big square. If one asked a
passerby where he was going it was usually to the midan, for
there was always something going on there, even at
night.
El Katai was surrounded by a network of narrow streets and
it is said that there were eventually a hundred thousand
houses in this city. It had lush gardens and zoos, along with
many gates (said to be nine) into the square. Each of the
gates had a special meaning and each a special name. One could
only enter by the gate of ones class or profession, though who
classified this large population we really don't know. There
was a Gate of Nobles and a Gate of Lions, surmounted by two
carved lions, and a gate called el Darmun because that was the
name of the captain of the guards. Ibn Tulun himself entered
through a special tri-arched gate of his own known as the
Hippodrome, and when he reviewed his troops he would lead them
through the center of it while up to thirty thousand men would
pass through the side arches.
Of the palace that Ibn Tulun built nine years earlier than
his mosque, nothing now remains, for his later rivals razed it
to the ground. Surviving sources indicate that it was built to
challenge the splendors of Samarra, and like the palaces of
the city, it to was immense in size and boasted gardens. The
palace was located next to the Hippodrome and was known as the
'Palace of the Hippodrome'.

Various tocco decoration on the soffits of the arcades of the Mosque of Ibn Tulun
Ibn Tulun would sit in a little summerhouse he had built
high up on the Gate of Lions and at night, look down on his
square which would always be filled with people and lights.
Particularly on feast days, there would be considerable
gaiety. By simply turning around, he could see the Mukattam on
one side and the Nile on the other. In fact, the whole
conception of this midan implies a rich and prosperous
population, as well as one that was not under too much
restraint.
The hospital that Ibn Tulun built between 872 and 874 AD,
known as a muristan, could be counted as modern even now. One
would leave their own clothes when entering it and put on
hospital garments. All food and medicines were free, and Ibn
Tulun inspected the hospital every Friday. This hospital was
built specifically for the general population, and in fact his
soldiers and guards were forbidden from its grounds. Tradition
holds that the hospital was built with money (60,000 dinars)
from a treasure trove found by one of Ibn Tulun's servants in
Upper Egypt. The servant was riding in the country one day
when his horse fell into a hole, and in the hole they found
treasure worth a million dinars. This is not an uncommon story
in Egypt, for more than one treasure has been discovered in
this manner. The hospital was further endowed with the
inalienable right to the profit from the slave market and
other large and prosperous markets.
To supply this new city with water, Ibn Tulun built an
aqueduct, at a cost of 40,000 dinars, of which several arches
are still extant between Birkat el Habash and the
palace.
The mosque that Ibn Tulun built and which survives in Cairo
must be one of the most beautiful and stimulating monuments
any historical figure has ever managed to leave behind him.
Its intrigue is only matched by a story about its founding. It
is said that Ibn Tulun did not want to rob any more Christian
churches of their columns because he thought it sacrilegious.
However, he required a mosque of considerable size. Hearing of
Ibn Tulun's problem, a Christian who was in jail for some
minor offense offered to build a very large mosque with no
columns, and he sent Ibn Tulun an outline showing a vast
enclosed courtyard with the mosque itself held up not by
marble columns but by squat brick piers supporting pointed
arches. Ibn Tulun immediately grasped the inventiveness of the
idea and freed the Christian, paying him 110,000 dinars for
his work, which was not bad considering the mosque itself cost
only 120,000 dinars.
This
is a good story but scholars doubt its validity, believing
rather that it was told to explain the use of brick piers,
which had never before been seen in Egypt. However, fire was
probably a concern, and marble disintegrates under flame,
while brick does not. Another factor is that at Samarra, in
the Tigris River basin, buildings were made from clay, so this
would also explain the use of brick. Brick must be very
cleverly used to be both imposing and beautiful, and there is
something so powerful and individual in those brick piers,
even now, with the famous pointed arches rising over them like
a ballerina's swanlike arms, that even a layman can see the
originality of this unusual design. This mosque was the first
to use the pointed arch in a vast architectural complex, and
it would be another two hundred years before Christians would
borrow it for their own Gothic arch. The cloisters were also
born in this kind of four-walled, colonnaded mosque. The whole
concept of this complex, brilliant it would seem in almost
every brick, probably owned its design not to a jailed Copt,
but to mosques already standing in Samarra, but in style at
least it is wholly Egyptian.
Ibn Tulun was not yet fifty when he got dysentery from
drinking too much milk. He was in Anticon on a military expedition
at the time, and was carried home to Fustat on a camel litter.
His doctors put him on a diet, but he became violent and
refused to obey them. In fact, when he was dying he had his
doctors flogged to death for their failure, and by 884, he was
gone.
Regrettably, Katai was a dynastic city that did not long
survive the Tulunids who built and inhabited the city. The
traveler Ibn Hawqal, who describes Fustat around 969, mentions
its disappearance when he writes, "Outside Fustat, there
used to be constructions built by Ahmad Ibn Tulun over an area
of a square mile where his troops were quartered, and it was
called Qata'i. It was comparable to Raqqada, which the
Aghlabids founded outside Qayrawan. Both of these sites have
today fallen into ruin. Of the two, Raqqada was stronger and
better appointed". Simply put, Katari was too
distant from the Nile, and could not develop as an autonomous
economic center.
References:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Cairo |
Raymond, Andre |
2000 |
Harvard University Press |
ISBN 0-674-00316-0 |
|
Cairo: An Illustrated History |
Raymond, Andre, Editor |
2002 |
Rizzoli, New York |
ISBN 0-8478-2500-0 |
|
Cairo (Biography of a City) |
Aldridge, James |
1969 |
Little, Brown and Company |
ISBN 72-79364 |
|
Cairo: The City Victorious |
Rodenbeck, Max |
1998 |
Vintage Books (A Division of Random House, Inc. |
ISBN 0-679-76727-4 |
|
Cambridge Illustrated History Islamic World |
Robinson, Francis |
1996 |
Cambridge University Press |
ISBN 0-521-43510-2 |
|
History of Islam, The |
Payne, Robert |
1959 |
Barns & Noble Books |
ISBN 1-56619-852-6 |
|
Islamic Architecture in Cairo, An Introduction |
Behrens-Abouseif, Doris |
1998 |
American University in Cairo Press, The |
ISBN 977 4247 2013 3 |
|
Islamic Monuments in Cairo: A Practical Guide |
Parker, Richard B., Sabin, Robin & Williams, Caroline |
1985 |
American University in Cairo Press, The |
ISBN 977 424 036 7 |
Archives
|