A fairly recent documentary starring Charlton Heston which has
aired on the Discovery Channel and other education networks
made an argument for Akhenaten,
Egypt's 18th
Dynasty heretic King with Moses of biblical fame. There is
nothing new in this argument, which has been made since antiquity.
Even Manetho,
and Egyptian Priest (c. 300 BC) who wrote a valuable history
of Egypt claims that the founder of monotheism, whom he called
Osarsiph, assumed the name Moses and led his followers out of
Egypt in Akhenaten's reign. Afterwards, other writers such as
Lysimachus, Tacitus and Strabo
also alluded to this association between Akhenaten and Moses.
In the modern era, Sigmund Freud (an active collector of
Egyptian artifacts) also proposed this theory in an
influential study of Moses and monotheism, and today there is
no small number of web sites that likewise continue this
argument.
Akhenaten
is frequently referred to as the heretic king because he
revolutionized Egyptian religion, at least for a brief period,
creating a system that was as close as ancient Egypt would
ever come to monotheism with his worship of the Sun Disk
called the Aten.
Strict monotheism is first demanded of the Israelites in
connection with Moses and the Israelite Exodus
from Egypt, and therefore, writers throughout the ages have
made the association between Akhenaten and Moses.
However, the Old Testament offers no evidence of a
relationship between Moses and Akhenaten,
and in fact there has never been any direct evidence of Moses
discovered in Egypt. It is even questionable whether the Old
Testament authors could have even known about him at all.
Because of Akhenaten's revolutionary religious ideas, his
successors largely eliminated his memory by hammering and
hacking his name and the record of his reign from monuments
throughout Egypt.
Furthermore, Akhenaten's
religion was, at least to some extent, the culmination of a
path established by earlier pharaohs, but perhaps even more
importantly, it should be noted that, according to the Bible,
only after leaving Egypt were the Israelites given the laws of
god which required that their Lord be worshipped exclusively.
In fact, monotheism plays no real significant role in the Book
of Exodus, which is assumed to be the earliest version of
Moses' story, and by all accounts, prior to receiving the Ten
Commandments, the Israelites worshipped more than one god.
Hence, while Akhenaten cannot be completely ruled out as the
Pharaoh of Exodus
fame, there is not much reason to believe that he was,
either.
In fact, the quest for Biblical accounts of ancient Egypt
at least into the 19th Dynasty of Egypt's New
Kingdom, take on an interesting approach by most investigators.
Essentially, since there is no evidence to clearly support the
existence of Joseph, or Moses, or the Israeli Exodus,
most of the investigation examines what was possible, what
cannot be ruled out, or what fits into and Egyptian context.
In other words, is it possible that such events or people
could have existed from what we know of ancient Egypt. Some
specifics are very possible, such as Joseph's rise to
importance in the Egyptian court. Other events, such as the Exodus,
as specifically told in the Bible, are much more difficult.
Though the Egyptians may not have liked to record defeats, it
would seem very probable that, were the disasters inflicted
upon them as detailed in the Bible, there would have survived
some textual evidence. For example, the Egyptians certainly
recorded events such as eclipses of the sun and the levels of
the Nile
Flood. Were the Nile to have turned to blood and every
firstborn child suddenly have died, not to mention all of the
other plagues mentioned in Exodus, there would have doubtless
been some record left, particularly during the New
Kingdom. Tomb records frequently provide us with the most
meager of details, and we have, from that period, many
thousands of documents recording civil actions and even
commercial contracts.
Therefore, in order for serious scholars to accept the
generality of such events, they must frequently reject some of
the details as fiction. Therefore, we begin to ask the
question of whether it was possible for Moses to have lived in
Egypt. The bible tells us that between his birth in Egypt and
death in Moab, Moses played many different roles. He had the
privilege to speak with god, to plead on behalf of his
community before the Pharaoh and to lead his people. He was a
miracle worker, a prophet, a lawmaker and lawgiver, as well as
a priest. Many scholars believe that at least some of these
functions were only attributed to him in the course of
tradition, but the key element here is his link between the
Hebrews and Egypt.
One possibility is to interpret the biblical Exodus
from Egypt is to set it against the known historical context
of the Kingdom of Israel and the fall of Samaria to the
Assyrians in 721 BC. In other words, the Exodus could have
been modeled on the people of Samaria who were forcibly
deported by their Assyrian conquerors. It could have reflected
the circumstances, experiences and hopes of these people.
Mostly, they needed a leader such as Moses.
The story of Moses' childhood has many features in common
with the Mesopotamian legend of King Sargon, who, as an
infant, was said to have been abandoned on the river in a
basket. This story would have been fairly contemporary to the
biblical authors of the 8th and 7th centuries BC who composed
parts of the Old Testament. Hence, they may have adapted the
Sargon legend to the Exodus,
but this could have also reflected a more ancient memory of a
similar event in Egypt. Therefore, while various details told
in the Biblical account of Exodus may be fictional, that does
not mean that some form of the Exodus did not take place, or
that Moses himself did not exist. Certainly people of his race
were in Egypt, and some probably served as slaves, as well as
masters.
Otherwise, we must remember that people generally tend to
build traditions around their historical founders, which in
many cases are not planted firmly in reality. Egypt's own
founder, Menes
(though because of historical records, we may make speculate),
is as difficult to identify as Moses, for while later
tradition firmly places him at the roots of historical Egypt,
contemporary proof is lacking. Consider also that only after
several hundred years, historians now doubt that George
Washington, one of the principal founding fathers of the
United States, ever cut down an apple tree only to show the
merits of honesty by confessing the act to his father.
In the final analysis, attributing Moses to a specific
person, or even determining which specific Pharaoh was
involved may always be a matter of speculation. To the modern
reader, the biblical Moses seems to oscillate between
tradition and reality, and more secure historical knowledge is
probably not possible, at least at present.. And though an Exodus
could have taken place, the specific details recorded in the
Bible largely fall outside the sphere of probability, given
the silence of any Egyptian record.
See also:
Archives
|