Shop our Online Store: Support Tour Egypt
Hotel Longchamps
Delta Tours
Best Way Travel
Al Sorat
Osoris Travel
Egypt Feature Story
The Kings (Pharaohs) of Ancient Egypt
by Jimmy Dunn
The title of "Pharaoh" actually comes to us from the Greek language and its use
in the Old Testament. It originates in the Egyptian Per-aa, meaning "Great
House", a designation of the palace, which first came to be used as a label
for the king around 1450 BC, though it only became common usage some
centuries later. For most of the time, the usual word for the king of
ancient Egypt was nesu, but a whole range of titles were applicable to any
full statement of a
king's names
and titulary.
According to Egyptian legend, the first kings of Egypt were later some of
Egypt's most famous gods. We really do not know whether some of these
individuals actually existed in human form or what regions of Egypt they may
have ruled over. Only at the end of the Predynastic period, prior to the
unification of Egypt, can we recognize specific kings who most likely ruled
over either northern or southern Egypt. According to many sources, the first
real king of Egypt, therefore ruling over the unified land, was
Menes, who would have
ruled Egypt around 3100 BC, but we have little if any archaeological basis
for this name. Most scholars today believe that he may have been a king
named Narmer,
or more likely still, Aha,
two figures that are better attested in the archaeological record. However,
Menes might have also been a legendary composition of several rulers. After
these first rulers of a unified Egypt, the Egyptian monarchy lasted in a
recognizable form for over three thousand years, basically ending with
Cleopatra, though even
Roman emperors attempted to style themselves as Egyptian pharaohs. We know
of 170 or more specific pharaohs during this period of time. Although many
changes occurred during that time, almost all of the fundamentals remained
the same.
Kings were not only males, and unlike in modern monarchies, the ruler of ancient Egypt, whether male or female, was always called a king. In fact, Egypt had some very noteworthy female rulers such as Hatshepsut and others.
In ancient (Pharaonic) Egypt, the pinnacle of Egyptian society, and
indeed of religion, was the king. Below him were the layers of the educated
bureaucracy which consisted of nobles, priests and civil servants, and under
them were the great mass of common people, usually living very poor,
agricultural based lives. Except during the earliest of themes, when the
highest official was apparently a Chancellor, for
most of Egyptian history,
the man or men just under the king were
Viziers, (tjaty),
a position that was roughly similar to a modern Prime Minister.
In many if not most accounts, the king is viewed as an incarnation of
Horus, a falcon
god, and the posthumous son of
Osiris, who
himself was a divine king slain by his brother,
Seth. Horus
fought his uncle for the return of the throne, and part of the accession
process of the king was the proper burial of his predecessor, as Horus
carrying out the last rites of Osiris. In fact, there are a number of cases
where such an act may have been the legal basis for a non-royal figure's
ascent of the throne. However, more usual was the succession of the eldest
son, whose status as heir was frequently, if not always, proclaimed during
his father's lifetime. Furthermore, there were a number of instances where
this was taken a step further by the heir's coronation as a co-regent prior
to the father's death. This has actually led to much confusion among
scholars,
because in some cases, the young heir began to count his regnal
years only after the death of his father, while in other instances, he
started to do so from the moment of his coronation. The ancient Egyptians
did not use era dating as we do today (BC or AD), but rather relied on regnal dating of the king's rule, and therefore potential difficulties for
modern, if not ancient, historians can easily be imagined.
The king himself (or herself) was the figure upon whom the whole administrative structure of the state rested. These god-kings usually commanded tremendous resources. The Pharaoh was the head of the civil administration, the supreme warlord and the chief priest of every god in the kingdom. All offerings were made in his name and the entire priesthood acted in his stead. In fact, he was himself a divine being, considered the physical offspring of a god. The myth of the ruler's divine birth centered on the god assuming the form of (or becoming incarnate in) the king's father, who then impregnated his wife, who accordingly bore the divine ruler.
Of course, the king was also subject to some rather grave
responsibilities. Through his dealings with the gods, he was tasked with
keeping the order, or
ma'at of the
land, and therefore keeping out chaos, often in the form of the
enemies of Egypt
from foreign lands. But he was
also responsible for making sufficient
offerings and otherwise satisfying the gods so that they would bless Egypt
with a bountiful
Nile flood, and therefore a good enough harvest to feed his people. When
he failed at these tasks, he could bear not only blame, but a weakening of
the state and thus his power. In drastic cases, such as at the end of the
Old Kingdom,
this could actually lead to a complete collapse of the Egyptian state.
Even today, many questions remain about the kings of ancient Egypt. We
have a fairly good idea of their order through time, though often scholars
disagree about specific dates related to our current form of the calendar.
Our evidence of their order comes mostly from various "kings' lists, that
almost exclusively were made during the
New Kingdom.
Another source is the Egyptian history written by Manetho, an Egyptian
priest, but over the years, there have been modifications to both the kings'
lists and Manetho's history made through archaeological discovery.
Nevertheless, there are periods of Egyptian history, particularly those
known as intermediate periods, where very little information exits on who
ruled (usually only a part of)
Egypt.
Basically, Manetho divided up ancient Egyptian history into thirty dynasties, though this division is a bit difficult, and modern scholarship has proven it to be not completely (and sometimes not at all) accurate. Most of the time, a dynasty consisted of a related family of rulers, though sometimes dynasties seem to have been broken up due to the establishment of a new capital. In a number of instances, modern Egyptologists believe that he may have been incorrect about the end of a family line.
Even today, the power that an ancient Egyptian pharaoh commanded in ancient Egypt and the resources under his control can seem staggering. One need only think in terms of the Great Pyramids, the wealth of gold and the grand temples to gain some understanding of their power. They commanded resources that many modern day states would be hard pressed to emulate, and they did so at a time when much of the remainder of the ancient world were struggling for a foothold in history.
See Also:
General Topics Related to Kings
Topics Related to Specific Kings
For the Earliest known Kings prior to the 1st Dynasty, see
References:
| Title | Author | Date | Publisher | Reference Number |
| Chronicle of the Pharaohs (The Reign-By-Reign Record of the Rulers and Dynasties of Ancient Egypt) | Clayton, Peter A. | 1994 | Thames and Hudson Ltd | ISBN 0-500-05074-0 |
| History of Ancient Egypt, A | Grimal, Nicolas | 1988 | Blackwell | None Stated |
| Monarchs of the Nile | Dodson, Aidan | 1995 | Rubicon Press | ISBN 0-948695-20-x |
| Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, The | Shaw, Ian | 2000 | Oxford University Press | ISBN 0-19-815034-2 |