The origins of Egyptian
religion are difficult if not impossible to define. We
have no doubt that its roots exist deep within prehistoric
times, occurring long before Egypt existed as a nation state
and the invention of writing. In fact, the hieroglyphic
symbol for god, described as a "cloth wrapped on a pole
by Alan H. Gardiner, predates the establishment of actual
Egyptian writing. Though many scholars are interested in this
topic, there exists little definitive evidence from which to
draw clear conclusions and so amongst anthropologists and Egyptologists,
there remain many different opinions.
Yet, many observations may be made about early Egyptian
religion from apparent cult objects, in human and animal
burials and from areas where formal rituals appear to have
taken place. Furthermore, the care with which the dead were
buried in the prehistoric period and the implied belief in an
afterlife certainly suggests that the early Egyptians were
very capable of a somewhat sophisticated theology. The
predynastic dead were buried facing west, in a contracted
position and with their hands clenched near the face and their
head toward the south. Their bodies were wrapped in a mat or a
hide for protection, and some provisions were placed either
outside this wrapping, or in a small niche dug in one of the
walls of the grave. The burial pit with its food offerings was
an image of the womb. The contracted fetal position of the
earliest surviving interments and the consistent direction of
the face to the west where the sun sets may very well suggest
the belief in spiritual rebirth. The spiritual significance of
these early burials is also demonstrated by the inclusion of
funerary provisions for the afterlife, such as pots, slate
palettes, jewelry and other items.
Like elsewhere in the early world, ancient Egyptians appear
to have had a reverence for the natural world in which they
existed, and on which they depended. They were perhaps
inspired by both the animate and inanimate world, though most
of the earliest physical evidence in Egypt points to their
development of the former. Therefore, the first clear
divinities we find in Egypt's archaeological record are for
the most cases, animal deities such as the cow and the falcon.
By the late prehistoric period, we also find evidence of other
animal that may have been worshipped as gods, including dogs
(or jackals), gazelles, cattle, hippopotamus and rams. They
were buried in what seems to have been ritual graves including
funerary goods and their images were recorded in figurines and
paintings. The major sites for such burials were, in Lower
Egypt, Maadi and Heliopolis,
and in Upper Egypt, Badari and Naqada.
Some Egyptologists believe that such depictions and
carvings may simply be totems of tribal groups or have other
unknown meanings, but most seem now to believe that there can
scarcely be any doubt that in at least the last centuries of
prehistory, the Egyptians for the most part worshipped divine
powers in animal form. If indeed they are manifestations of
the divine, then we may see in them a significant stage in the
development of the Egyptian gods of later periods. The idea
that the divine might be manifest in animal form is a vital
prerequisite for the animals which are shown acting in
entirely human ways and which are the major representations of
Egyptian gods at the end of the Predynastic
Period.
Recent study of sites at Nabta Playa and Bir Kisseiba in
the Sahara west of the Upper Nile Valley indicate that cattle
were particularly important in the development of Egyptian
religious beliefs. They may have been venerated even prior to
their domestication around 7000 BC. At Tushka in Nubia,
the horn cores of cows were placed in burials as early as
10,000 BC, suggesting their afterlife beliefs. Whether this
evidence represents early cults or not, it fits well with the
prevalence in dynastic Egypt of the imagery of cows in
association with early goddesses such as Hathor,
Nut and
Neith.
It is very likely that this later imagery was merely a
continuation of a much older tradition of primordial cow
goddesses that sprang from the context of Neolithic cattle
herding in the Egyptian Sahara. Fekri Hassan has pointed out
that both the cow and woman gave milk, and both shared an
identity as a source of life and nourishment. The idea that
mothers, both human or bovine, gave physical birth and
sustenance, was therefore a powerful influence on early
Egyptian religion.

The Narmer Palette
In the Narmer Palette, which dates to the period of
transition between predynastic and dynastic Egypt, we find on
the reverse side a falcon holding a captive and on the obverse
a bull breaking down a city wall and trampling an enemy
figure. There are also mythical serpopards with long
necks on both sides of the palette, and a deity with a cow's
head that fuses human and bovine features that surmounts these
scenes. Here, the cow figure is more closely identifiable to Bat,
a goddess who was later worshipped in the seventh Upper
Egyptian nome, than to the better known Hathor. It is also
important to note the stars on the palette, that surely even
at this date identify her as a sky goddess. Hence, as we see
the earliest Egyptian writing appear, so too do we definitely
see among the artifacts of the period indisputable zoomorphic
deities.
Evidence of deities in human form at the earliest states of
Egyptian religious development are less clear. This is
interesting because in many early societies, the magic that
allowed women to bleed without dying and to give birth and nourishment
inspired primeval goddesses of great importance. There
have been unearthed, from the Naqada Period and the earlier
Badari culture, crudely formed anthropomorphic figures made of
clay or ivory. Though traditionally interpreted as deities,
more recent study of these figures indicate a variety of uses
and meanings is likely, while none may definitively be
associated with deities. A "great mother goddess" is
quite unknown in Egypt during the earlier historical period,
one must be skeptical about the attempt to identify naked,
bearded figures as gods. In reliefs and paintings of the time,
pointed beards of this sort were mostly worn by enemies, while
in late predynastic and early dynastic times, nakedness is
reserved for subjugated enemies of Egypt. Peter J. Ucko
believes that they could have served as children's dolls,
magically efficacious images used in various rituals or as
votive offerings as well as for other purposes.
Yet it is also clear that by the very beginning of the
historical period, deities such as Min,
Neith and Onuris were being worshipped in human form, and it
is probable that they could have been worshipped as such
already in the Naqada period, but their human iconography is
know only from historical times. The earliest depictions of
gods in human form show a body usually without separate limbs,
and though true mummification was not yet practiced,
nevertheless resembling a mummiform.
Anthropomorphic deities were
slow to develop in Egypt, and in fact throughout Egyptian
history, gods and goddesses were almost always viewed as
hybrid forms, part human and part animal. Even into the late
predynastic and Early
Dynasty Period, Egyptian kings retained animal names such
as Scorpion,
Catfish,
Kite and Cobra. Hence, while Hathor was one of the first
deities to be given anthropomorphic form, she retained the
horns of her sacred animal, the cow, and she was frequently
depicted in bovine form thousands of years after her initial
appearance. There also continued to be gods who were never
portrayed as anything but animals, such as the Apis
bulls.
Much less clear is the development of the deification of
inanimate objects. There is almost a complete lack of evidence
in this regard, and yet, this does not mean that early
Egyptian religion did not encompass some aspects of such
worship. At Gerzeh, there is in fact reoccurring
star images and other artifacts from the late Neolithic Period
(3600 - 3300 BC) that may indicate an early astral cult that
developed in Egypt. However, it is entirely possible that
spiritual beliefs surrounding inanimate objects such as the
sky were simply not as easy to represent in physical form, as
were animals and people.
Most anthropologists view the concept of individualized
deities who hold power over certain events, such as harvests
are child birth, as a desire by ancient man to gain some kind
of control over the natural world and human
vulnerability. Very likely, the needs of early human
societies throughout the ancient world were the same
everywhere, though the immediate vulnerability of ancient
humans at the hands of nature probably gradually gave way to
the awareness of longer term needs such as the freedom from
pain and want.
When, around 3,000 BC, Upper and Lower Egypt was united, it
is likely that the perceived and real religious needs of the
people changed. It was then that, for the first time, national
deities came into existence, together with the divine cult of
the king. Not only was the land united, but much of its
religion as well. This marks the end of Egyptian religion's
formative years, for over the next 3,000 years, subsequent
historical development would fail to radically change the
underlying nature of Egyptian religion.
Resources:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference Number |
|
Ancient Gods Speak, The: A Guide to Egyptian Religion |
Redford, Donald B. |
2002 |
Oxford University Press |
ISBN 0-19-515401-0 |
|
Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt, The |
Wilkinson, Richard H. |
2003 |
Thames & Hudson, LTD |
ISBN 0-500-05120-8 |
|
Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt: The One and the Many |
Hornung, Erik |
1971 |
Cornell University Press |
ISBN 0-8014-8384-0 |
|
Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses, A |
Hart, George |
1986 |
Routledge |
ISBN 0-415-05909-7 |
|
Egypt Before the Pharaohs |
Hoffman, Michael A. |
1979 |
Barnes & Noble Books |
ISBN 0-88029-457-4 |
|
Great Goddesses of Egypt, The |
Lesko, Barbara S. |
1999 |
University of Oklahoma Press |
ISBN 0-8061-3202-7 |
|
Religion in Ancient Egypt: Gods, Myths, and Personal Practice |
Baines, John; Lesko, Leonard H.; Silverman, David P. |
1991 |
Cornell University Press |
ISBN 0-8014-2550-6 |
Archives
|