|
In what Egyptologists might refer to as more or less
the "standard temple", for their design could vary
considerably, there was usually a courtyard after the massive
pylon gateway. In fact, in some huge complexes there could end
up being pylon followed by courtyard in repetitions. It should
be noted that there were indeed many variances in temples, and
for example, private mortuary temples, while they did usually
have a courtyard, functioned somewhat differently than other
temple complexes. Also over time, temples did of course
evolve. We are most familiar with the New Kingdom
temples as
the fully evolved complex.
In a practical sense, the outer courtyard had a
transitional purpose, serving as an interface between the
outside world and the sanctified regions deeper within the
temple.
We may refer to the courtyard after the pylon as an outer
court. It was usually of the same width as the following
hypostyle hall and took on a rectangular plan. It was
almost always an open peristyle court that would be partially
surrounded on its sides by a colonnade that was covered by an
ambulatory. The courtyards were almost always paved. Within
the court was often located a great altar for the offerings,
usually on one side of the central axis (for example, at
Medamud). In the earliest temples the portico, sitting upon a
raised platform, seems to have stretched only in front of the
rear wall of the court and was reached by way of a ramp.

Notation: A column structure usually consists of a base, shaft and capital.
Above the capital is a small support known as an Abacus, and
above that is the Architrave that that in turn supports the
roof. The partial roof structure is called an
Ambulatory.
The outer courtyard could be referred to by several
different names by the ancient Egyptians, depending on the
type of column employed. It was the columns themselves that distinguished
both the structure and the symbolic function of this
area.
It was the outer courtyard that gave the common people a
sense of belonging to the temple precinct, for although it was
a part of the temple proper, they were often given access to
this area, at least in part or to celebrate special occasions.
In fact, during the Greek period (Ptolemaic), the name given
to this area was "the court of the multitude" and
the nekhyt hieroglyphs that represented the people of Egypt
were often inscribed on walls or columns within this court.
This hieroglyph in fact indicated where people should gather
during the great processions and festivals.
Hence it is no surprise that the decorative theme of the
outer court often portrayed the pharaoh, in painted low or
sunk reliefs, in various historical or religious activities,
leading military expeditions for the benefit of the local
deity, worshiping the gods, and playing his part in festivals
or in foundation ceremonies. However, nothing of the divine
mysteries would be revealed in the scenes.
Furthermore, in many temples, there were probably specific
areas within the court (or at times outside the temple) where
people could lodge petitions, meet priests on personal
matters, or conduct business with the temple officials.
In a very real sense, the outer courts of ancient Egyptian
temples bought the common people and the temple complex
together. Here, from the Middle Kingdom onward, we find
private statuary along side the royal statues of kings and
gods. These types of statues were usually unobtrusive, taking
the form of a block statue depicting the private individual
sitting, squatting on the ground or kneeling before a deity in
humble reverence. Practically, this created a patronage and
bond, but religiously, these statues of commoners perhaps
provided a great deal of comfort. The Egyptians believed that
their soul could reside in a statue as a physical, alternative
host after their death. With their personal statue located
inside the temple proper, it would give them access, or at
least close proximity to the cult's gods. Moreover,
inscriptions on the statues implored the utterance of their
names which would keep their spirits alive, while other
inscriptions might request that an offering formula be recited
on their behalf. During the Middle Kingdom, the private
statuary was almost always of men, though there were a few
exceptions. However, by the New
Kingdom, private statues of
women were not uncommon.
Like royal statues, those of highly regarded individuals
were thought to potentially be able to act as an
intermediary between common people and the gods. For example,
an 18th dynasty block statue of Amenophis, son of Hapu at
Thebes even implores the viewer to "come to me and I will
transmit your petitions" to the god Amun. However, this
service was not offered free of charge, for the requester in
return had to pronounce the deceased's name, and recite the
offering formula on behalf of Amenophis.
One must remember that many temple complexes existed for
countless centuries. In this vast space of time, the outer
court could become very crowded with private, as well as royal
statues. Yet, the temple priests were always required to
accept new statuary. There solution to this problem was, at
times, to bury the older statues beneath the temple courtyard
in caches, which have at times been a bonanza for
Egyptologists. In 1903, for example, Georges Legrain made the
discovery of a lifetime while working at Karnak. The cache of
statues he discovered over three years of excavations, now
known as the Karnak Cachette, consisted of some 900 stone
statues and statuettes dating mainly from the 20th Dynasty
through the Greek period. More recently, another cache was
discovered in the nearby temple of
Luxor, though somewhat less
grand in size.
See Also:
References:
| Title |
Author |
Date |
Publisher |
Reference
Number |
| Atlas of Ancient
Egypt |
Baines, John;
Malek, Jaromir |
1980 |
Les Livres De
France |
None Stated |
| Complete
Temples of Ancient Egypt, The |
Wilkinson,
Richard H. |
2000 |
Thames and
Hudson, Ltd |
ISBN
0-500-05100-3 |
| Dictionary of
Ancient Egypt, The |
Shaw, Ian;
Nicholson, Paul |
1995 |
Harry N. Abrams,
Inc., Publishers |
ISBN
0-8109-3225-3 |
| Oxford
History of Ancient Egypt, The |
Shaw, Ian |
2000 |
Oxford
University Press |
ISBN
0-19-815034-2 |
| Valley
of the Kings |
Weeks,
Kent R. |
2001 |
Friedman/Fairfax |
ISBN 1-5866-3295-7 |
Archives
|